Many target responses were unanswered before the time limit.
Tymir Brightwell — Try: Practice Fact Family Triangles
7 · 12 · 848 · 12 · 96
Built from the practice your students already do. Ten minutes to read.
Fluency Intelligence reads the practice your students already do and writes one page for you each Monday: who to group, which strategy to use, and which materials from your own curriculum to open.
Presale now — Fluency Intelligence opens to everyone this school year. Private beta classrooms are already receiving briefs.
Many target responses were unanswered before the time limit.
Tymir Brightwell — Try: Practice Fact Family Triangles
7 · 12 · 848 · 12 · 96
Responding accurately and within 6 seconds.
Carter Ashford, Chastity Marlow, Maci Penrose, Morgan Quillan
Check readiness to advance — Multiplication
Keeping pace, but the same facts keep being missed.
Ashton Fairbrook Missing2×84×64×96×7
| Adrionna Hollister | ÷ 6s | 99 | 100% | ▲ up | Check practice or program |
| Brooklyn Winslade | × 6s | 88 | 86% | ▼ down | Continue current practice |
| Tymir Brightwell | ÷ 6s | 93 | 80% | ▲ up | Work with these students |
This week's move One named next step for every student.
Tier IV means XtraMath's approach rests on a documented logic model supported by research, and that an evaluation is underway or planned. It is not a claim of proven outcomes; those are Tiers I through III. We state the tier we hold rather than the one that would sell better.
One page, built from 1.3 billion minutes of real practice. Here is what is on it.
The brief opens with the students who need teacher time. Each group names the fact program, what the practice shows, what to check, and a strategy to try.
Students answering accurately within six seconds are flagged so you can confirm they are done and choose the next assignment. Students without enough recent sessions get no recommendation, only a request: practice on at least two days next week.
These students are keeping pace and need no teacher time this week. The brief lists the exact facts each one keeps missing, so you know what to check next week.
The roster covers the whole class in alphabetical order: focus, mastery, recent accuracy, trend, status and next step. A glossary at the end of the brief explains each status and next step.
| Student | Focus | Mastery | Recent | Trend | Status | Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrionna Hollister | ÷ 6s | 99 | 100% | ▲ up | Ready to advance | Check practice or program |
| Brooklyn Winslade | × 6s | 88 | 86% | ▼ down | Stable maintenance | Continue current practice |
| Delyia Ravenel | × 6s | 43 | 48% | steady | Unstable read | Work with these students |
| Hayden Thorne | × 6s | — | — | — | Needs more evidence | Get 2+ days next week |
| Rae'Elle Calloway | × 6s | 76 | 72% | ▲ up | Working at edge | Work with these students |
| Tymir Brightwell | ÷ 6s | 93 | 80% | ▲ up | Working at edge | Work with these students |
Students keep the same ten-minute daily practice. The analysis happens between practice and instruction, and the brief comes back to teacher judgment.
The same adaptive daily routine millions of classrooms already know. No new app, no new login.
Practice evidence is assessed and matched to research-based strategies.
Every claim is audited before it is sent.
One page in your inbox, every Monday: who is grouped with whom, which strategy, and what to do about thin evidence.
The brief changes what happens in class, and that changes next week's practice. The loop closes every Monday.
Working memory is a hidden bottleneck. Overload produces the same symptom on both sides, and neither is a failure of effort.
Nationally, 39% of fourth graders and 28% of eighth graders scored at or above proficient in mathematics (NAEP, 2024). Fluency is one contributing factor among many — but it is one that compounds quietly.
The 39% and 28% figures are from the 2024 NAEP mathematics assessment (grades 4 and 8). NAEP “Proficient” is a demanding standard set by the National Assessment Governing Board and is not equivalent to grade level as most states define it — a student below NAEP Proficient is not necessarily below their state's grade-level standard. Grades 4 and 8 are separately drawn samples, not the same students measured twice.
Illustrative. The capacity does not change — what changes is how much of it the facts consume.
A student can understand the lesson and still run out of working memory before the work is done. When basic facts still require counting or reconstruction, calculation competes with reasoning for the same limited capacity. Fluency that stays unfinished tends to narrow what comes later, and usually only the symptoms are visible:
How it shows up, in orderA teacher's week runs about 54 hours, and fewer than half of those hours are spent teaching. About a dozen of the rest go to planning, preparation, and grading: the work of deciding what each student needs next.
One square per hour of a 54-hour week.
No one can hold thirty fluency journeys in their head. Without coherent and timely information, planning defaults to the middle of the room, and the students at both edges wait.
What the brief costsThe brief speaks to the amber hours above: planning, preparation, and deciding what each student needs next.
None of these is a setting. They are how the product is built, and they are in the agreement.
Fluency Intelligence never talks to children. The analysis never reaches a student.
Recommendations, never prescriptions. Placement and intervention stay with educators.
The same ten-minute routine students already know. No new apps, no new logins.
Briefs inform teachers. They are not surveillance and they do not grade anyone. A teacher may override any output at any time, and XtraMath does not penalize, flag or disadvantage them for doing so.
The brief links to the curriculum resources your school already approved. It does not write new content for your classroom.
When a student's recent practice is too thin to interpret, the brief says so instead of producing a recommendation.
Identifiers are replaced before any model is called, so the provider receives practice statistics under a temporary code — never a name, email, school, class or account. Training on that data is prohibited by contract, and XtraMath alone holds the key.
The learning science behind fluency and working memory is well established. The impact of the brief itself is a hypothesis under test with beta classrooms, and we report it that way.
We report what has been established and what has not. Nothing here is a claim we cannot support.
Standard stays free for any teacher and any family. Pro adds Fluency Intelligence: the Classroom Brief that groups your students, and the Student Brief that tracks each one.
Fluency Intelligence is in presale. Private beta classrooms are already receiving briefs, and it opens to everyone this school year. Reserve now to hold presale pricing through October 31st, 2026 — we will email you the exact launch date as soon as it is set.
It arrives by email on Monday morning. There is nothing to check and nothing new to log into. Weekly briefs begin when Fluency Intelligence opens to everyone this school year.
The brief still works. It gives you a per-student table with mastery, change since last week, and a next action, so you can use it without grouping at all. The groups are a suggestion, not a requirement.
The first Monday after you turn it on. Briefs go out Mondays, built from the practice your class has already completed.
You are the teacher — ignore it. The brief is a recommendation built from practice evidence, not a decision. When the evidence is thin it says so rather than guessing, and nothing in it is ever applied to a student automatically.
No. Students never interact with AI. Fluency Intelligence runs behind the teacher, assessing practice evidence after it is created. The student experience is the same ten-minute routine XtraMath has always offered.
No new apps, no new logins, no new student-facing software. Students keep the same ten-minute daily practice; teachers get a ten-minute weekly read.
Yes. Standard XtraMath stays free. Forever, for any teacher and any family. Fluency Intelligence is part of XtraMath Pro, added on top.
No. Briefs are recommendations for professional judgment. Placement and intervention decisions stay with educators. It is not surveillance and it does not grade anyone.
You can pay online in the app: at sign-up for a new account, or from License & Plans in an existing one. Purchase orders are also accepted, and XtraMath Pro is eligible under Title I and ESSER.
No. Premium remains available at your current pricing through 2026–27, but it does not include Fluency Intelligence or features released after it. Schools and districts moving to XtraMath Pro get a 50% renewal discount through 2026–27. Ask us for a quote and we will show you both side by side.
No. Students keep the same ten-minute daily practice, and teachers keep every instructional decision. The brief is a ten-minute read on Monday, not a new routine.
Nothing breaks. The brief is information, not an assignment. A teacher who ignores it changes nothing for their students, who continue with the same practice they already do.
Two Advanced Reports show school-wide information: the Weekly Usage Report and the Monthly Student Report, both on the License detail page in the School License Admin's account. A Weekly School Brief built on Fluency Intelligence is on the roadmap, without a confirmed delivery date.
Yes. Standard XtraMath stays free, forever, for any teacher and any family. Pro is added on top for the teachers you choose.
No. Premium remains available at your current pricing through 2026–27, but it does not include Fluency Intelligence or features released after it. Schools and districts moving to XtraMath Pro get a 50% renewal discount through 2026–27. Ask us for a quote and we will show you both side by side.
Through Clever, Clever SecureSync, or ClassLink.
Yes. Clever, ClassLink and Google.
Only the practice evidence students already generate in XtraMath: the fact, the answer, and the response time. It is retained for the term of the agreement and deleted on request, per the DPA.
Yes. A signable DPA and a current subprocessor list are both available before purchase.
Yes. XtraMath Pro is ESSA Tier IV, which means it demonstrates a rationale: there is a documented logic model and evaluation underway, not yet causal evidence of impact. The documentation is available on request.
Anthropic's Claude models, accessed directly or through AWS Bedrock. Before any model call, direct identifiers are replaced with a temporary code: the model receives practice statistics only, never a student or teacher name, email address, school, class or account identifier, and no demographic attribute. Training on that data is contractually prohibited. XtraMath and AWS hold the data; no other provider receives it.
No. Our providers are contractually barred from training on it. So is everyone else: our Terms of Service prohibit using XtraMath data, or Fluency Intelligence output, to train or evaluate any model.
No. The findings come from fixed, explainable rules; the model only puts them into words and may not add findings, diagnoses or recommendations of its own. Nothing in a brief is applied to a student automatically, and a teacher may override anything without consequence.
Not yet. The first disparate-impact review runs after the first full school term of use, once enough data exists to support it, and at least annually after that. Until then the controls are design controls: fixed rules, no demographic inputs, quality checks before delivery, and free teacher override. We report it that way rather than claim more.
Grouping, mastery and change are computed deterministically from practice evidence. The language of the brief is model-written, then audited for unsupported claims, invented information, and deficit framing before a teacher sees it.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA, FERPA, COPPA, CCPA and GDPR compliant, ad-free, and a 501(c)(3) nonprofit since 2009.
Get a quote for your school, or see the sample brief first.
Presale pricing holds through October 31st, 2026.